Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Chapter 6 and 7 Wittgenstein Quiz

Chapter 6+7 Quiz

1. 1.As I understand them, atomic propositions are propositions that are, like atoms, reduced to their smallest form. They cannot be further analyzed or broken down. The second half of the question is alluding to the idea that atomic propositions make up everything; they “construct” words and symbols, and in order to fully understand those words and symbols one must first understand and comprehend the building blocks.

2. The idea of something being in two places at once or of two particles being in the same place at the same time is what Ramsey refers to as impossibility. To him, this idea is concerned with physical science. He contradicts Wittgenstein’s view of it being related to the needs and concerns of logic. These ideas are illogical when stated, but can be attempted to be explained through physics.

3. Up until he wrote his third publication, Wittgenstein’s view of language (as described in Tractacus) was that the inexpressible should not be expressed. Now, under the guidance of Ramsey, he in a way rewrote his entire philosophy. He no longer thought of the one logical form (which Ramsey rejected) but of how language an logic can be underscored in philosophical propositions (something he did not believe in before).


4.This is Wittgenstein’s own writing, I believe. He is saying that instead of meticulously stating how to solve a philosophical problem or dilemma, one must describe its nature completely. Description is a much more beautiful word than explanation. It implies a holistic approach to a philosophical issue—one that, through language, attempts to bring about complete understanding.


5.
Uebersicht! Hurrah! Technically, uebersicht means oversight, but the book had a different definition that I interpreted as “reaching for clarity.” Monk talks about Goethe, and his morphological approach to science. Wittgenstein did the same thing with language (Goethe was very influential to him). I think this means that he tried to make language beautiful while having it maintain its logical undertones.

1 comment:

  1. 1. Why does this writing of Wittgenstein symbolize the threshold between the Tractatus and his later writing? What "trap" of the pursuit of knowledge and truth has Wittgenstein fallen into similar to philosophers since the Greeks?
    2. Good answer. Is it possible for 2 colors to be in the same space at the same time? How did Wittgenstein's propositions themselves lead to Ramsey's critique?
    3. What does this say about how Wittgenstein will approach theories?
    4. Did you notice what I asked you to do? Why would description be closer to showing rather than telling?
    5.Something we said in class today: Clarity and Uebersicht, perspecuity lead closer to truth in a medium (language) that is in a constant state of flux. I am unclear what you mean by "he tried to make language beautiful while having it maintain it's logical undertones." Can you give me some Uebersicht? Danke

    ReplyDelete